The up.time IT Systems Management Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Terremark’

2010 – The Year of Cloud Experimentation – Part 1 of 2

Monday, November 30th, 2009

At uptime software, we’ve been quite bullish on Cloud’s potential but feel it still has some distance to cover before it lives up to the hype. In fact, I wrote a blog in January looking at a hypothetical company and the costs involved in moving an entire infrastructure into the Cloud (using Amazon EC2). The results were not impressive, Cloud computing was too expensive (in this example) to gain the critical mass it needs to catch on. It’s amazing how much had changed in the ten months since that blog, as we have learned more about how the Cloud can be best utilized. Recently, the media has driven the Cloud excitement and IT managers are now thinking about how the Cloud, in one form or another, can be used in their environments to drive performance and efficiencies.

The real question is this; in what capacity will organizations adopt Cloud over the next few years? With that in mind, we see the coming year as one of exploration and experimentation. The first step is for companies to quantify what Cloud means to their business.  Is it as banal as remote storage used for DR purposes, or something as evolved as dynamic compute with secure private/public networking?

Let’s take a look at the “IT Spectrum,” which is loosely aligned with IT maturity and size of organization.

In this diagram, the left represents most small businesses who house their own servers and have a small number of IT staff.  As the small business matures, they may evaluate SaaS-type applications (like Salesforce.com) or push some servers out to an MSP.  Further maturing, or growing, businesses may have additional servers in remote hosted datacenters, like web servers or remote disaster recovery storage.  At the right-most point in the spectrum, businesses/enterprises have opted to completely outsource their IT and minimize the number of IT staff employed by the business.

Understanding the spectrum’s components is important. They represent a “menu” of options that businesses can use to leverage virtualization and cloud technologies to reduce costs (either labor or infrastructure).  This “menu” is most likely how IT managers will choose to evaluate the relevance of Cloud to cost savings and enhanced service delivery.  For example, with VMware’s new VBlock offering and the ongoing relationship with Terremark, entire stacks of infrastructure can be pushed into off-premises locations and operated in a mission-critical environment. So, whether it’s just dipping a toe into the Cloud waters (like hosting a server in Amazon EC2 or the RackSpace Cloud to deliver a decoupled application) or leveraging the VBlock to move entire mission critical infrastructures, there are many options to consider. Keep in mind that issues such as backup management, lifecycle management, and systems management need to be addressed in all cases.

How is the experimentation starting?

[ more next week in Part 2 ]

The Cloud goes beyond Virtualization

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

There is a article over at The Cloud Option discussing how virtualization is not Cloud.  It is summed up very well in this statement:

“Cloud/IaaS goes beyond virtualization by providing extra services for dynamically allocating infrastructure resources to match the peaks and valleys of application demand.”

I think that when people discuss the public/private cloud, this is an often understated point.  Simply virtualizing your existing infrastructure with your favourite hypervisor does not mean you have implemented a private cloud within your datacenter.  Cloud is about enablement, not virtualization.  As ‘The Cloud Option’ says, virtualization is a valuable first step, but it is not Cloud.

From my perspective, Cloud is all about the ability to deploy and manage business services without the involvement of an infrastructure team.  If you develop application X for the Cloud, given the right permissions, you should be able to provision the application into production without ever involving someone from the IT department responsible for providing the Cloud resource.

Once provisioned, you should be able to manage, maintain and scale application X without ever involving IT.  Virtualization alone is never going to give you this.  Cloud is about tools, and given the infrastructure requirements to deliver todays applications and services, it’s about about simple tools performing complex tasks behind the scenes.  I go back to the article at ‘Cloud Option’ and, as they suggest, at a minimum the Cloud provider (internal or external) must bring:  Self Service, Resource Metring & Accountability, Image Management and Network Policy Enforcement.

up.time provides great visibility into your physical and virtual assets that are a part of your Cloud strategy, by provinding deep Cloud monitoring and Cloud management, as well as traditionally deployed applications.  In conjunction with our vOrchestrator integration, up.time can also provide resource automation for the scaling and provisioning of applications into the Cloud.

I think Terremark is heading down the right path with their Cloud offering, providing a complete solution to their customers with self management from the application to the virtual network and its security features.  I also think that as enterprises look to push their applications and data onto the Cloud, network capabilities are going to become the real differentiator between Cloud offerings.  We are at the point where virtualization at the server level is a known and pretty comodditized good.  However, at the network layer there are all kinds of opportunities to provide value as part of the overall Cloud offering.  From basic firewalling and load balancing to application aware layer 7 switching and deep packet manipulation, these are all capabilities that will allow Cloud providers like Terremark to differentiate themselves from one another.

Just how disruptive is Cloud technology?

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Let’s understand for a moment just how disruptive Cloud and virtualization technologies are to OTHER technologies. Ignore for a moment, all the changes required to business processes, maintenance processes, infrastructure deployment models and all the other stuff people have been beating to death over the past 2 months.

Just how pervasive and challenging is Cloud technology to entrenched technology? Well for one, people are redesigning and re-thinking how we use TCP/IP in order to enable and Long Distance VMotion. That’s right, in order to be able to forklift virtual instances and massive data over the internet, companies like netex have figured out how to make the old building block of the interwebs TCP/IP even better – dubbing their new UDP over IP translation technology “HyperIP”.  HyperIP optimizes TCP/IP so that you can move a full vmware instance over the wire up to 10X faster than usual. (Let’s not even talk about how people will monitor this new disruptive technology, but you can bet it’s the agile players who are even aware of the new challenges in this space).

The potential for this technology is 100% clear, and probably is somewhere in a lab being coveted by the people at VMWare as “my precious” – especially in the context of their desire to get remote DRS as a solidified feature in the VSPHERE platform.   If VMware manages to get this integrated as part of remote DRS and they start forklifting instances to/from and across the Savvis and Terremark clouds this will be a giant leap towards making unified compute and private/public clouds – “as real as it gets”. This doesn’t even take into account the latest ‘turnkey’ private cloud solutions unveiled by VMWare known as VBlocks.

The clouds just zapped TCP/IP, what’s next?